It
has been a matter of discussion since very long time; different different
professional has different interpretation on this topic that is why it is a one
of the most hot and controversial topic in corporate world.
Let's go in the background of section 185 of Companies Act 2013
In
earlier companies act there was no separate provisions for efficiently
regulation of Director's loan related criteria. However to incorporate
stringent director loan compliances the new act has brought up a separate
section i.e. S. 185 of companies act 2013 dealing with directors loan.
To bring this section
into existence there was a reason because directors of the company take the
loan from company by using undue advantage of their position for using their
own purposes, which affects the financial position of company
simultaneously affect the interest of stakeholders.
Loan to Director as per section 185 of companies act 2013
Giving
Loan, including representing in book debts, or giving gurantee/security in
connection with loan taken by director is prohibited to directors and some
specified Persons (any other person where director is interested), either
directly or indirectly.
INTERPRETATION BY AUTHOR
Under
whole companies act the word loan is nowhere defined, so we take the meaning of
loan from Oxford dictionary which simply defines “Lending of any sum of money
with promise to pay"
INTERPRETATION BY AUTHOR
Representing in
book debts what does it means, it means No company can convert loan given
to its director into DEBTORS
However
credit sales made by company to its director is completely allowed if it
is in normal course then their is no question arise for representing in
book debts. Because earlier section 295 of old act does not explicitly include the
phrase “any loan represent by book debts " hence any kind of
credit facility extended by company will not cover under the Loan to Director.
INTERPRETATION
BY AUTHOR
Meaning
of indirectly is same as decided in case of " Fredie Ardeshir Mehta v. Union of India " it can not
be read as converting what is not a loan into loan if we explicit it further we
can understand word indirectly means providing loan through agencies or
any other medium but does not qualify to be loan or loan represented by
book debt or security or guarantee into loan , any loan represented
by book debts or guarantee or security.
Meaning of specified person ( any person where director is
interested)
1. Director of lending
company
2.
Director of ifs holding company
3.
Any partner of any such director
4.
Any relative of any such director
5.
Any firm in which any such director is partner
6.
Any firm in which any relative of such director is partner
7.
Any private company of which any such director is director or member
8.
Any body corporate in which any such director holds at least 25% of total
voting power
9.
Any body corporate who’s BOD, manager, managing director, whereof is
accustomed to act on the directions of director of lending company.
INTERPRETATION
BY AUTHOR
In
the point no.9 director of only lending company has been
considered, however for rest of the points director of lending
company and director of holding company both has been considered.
In simple if BOD, manager or managing director of any body corporate is
accustom to act on directions of director of holding company it is not
cover under section 185.
There is
one important thing to be notice that partner of relative of any director
is not cover in above cases here law is completely silent it means loan can be
given to him.
Reference Of Companies Amendment Act 2017.
Under this amendment still restrictions has
been imposed by law maker for granting of loan to director. However loan can be
granted in below specified cases by passing special resolution in general
meeting.
1) Any private company of which any such
director is director or member
2) Any body corporate in which any such
director holds at least 25% of total voting power
3) Any body corporate who’s BOD
manager, managing director, whereof is accustomed to act on the directions of director of
lending company
Who all are eligile to take loan from company.
* Managing director or
manger in ordinary course of business by passing special resolution
as per their terms of employment.
*
A wholly owned subsidiary company is allowed to take loan, securities,
guarantee from its holding company.
*
A holding company can provide securities, or guarantee to its subsidiary
company in connection with loan taken from bank or financial institutions.
Non Applicability Of This Section On Certain Cases.
* If advance salary is
given to employee who is relative of director (because advance is not loan)
*
If loan given to a trust where director is trustee
* If
any flat or any accommodations given by company to any director under central
government housing scheme
*
Loan given to any public company or listed company where director of
lending company is director or member of such company (restriction is only on
private company)
*
Any investment made for residential house for director.
*
Any loan is made to registered co-opeative society.
*
A private company if following condition satisfied,
1)
In whose share capital no other body corporate as invested any money;
2)
If the borrowings of such a company form banks or financial institutions or any
body corporate is less than twice of its paid-up share capital or fifty crore
rupees, whichever is lower; and
3)
Such a company has no default in repayment of such borrowings subsisting at the
time of making transactions under this section.
All
these conditions need to be fulfilled at the time of advancing of any loan or
providing guarantee or security
Applicability Of Provisions In Relation With Loan Taken From
Director
It
is a misconception in the mind of various people that if loan is taken from
director it will be treated as related party transaction as people use the
logic that director is cover under the definition of related party.
However
it is completely wrong because section 188 only applies where that 7
transactions mentioned in the section take place.
So here the secrets reveal.
If
loan taken from director by the company first check whether such loan is given
by director from its owned funds or it was borrowed one. if such funds are
borrowed in that case applicability of deposit sections (73 -76) will
come to the picture.
However
if not borrowed funds in that case company has to follow section 179(3).
Posted
by LAWgicAL ARUSH
0 coment:
Please do not post any spam link.